I subscribe to the ideal in karma yoga of being detached from the fruits of one’s actions. This is wonderful, as it lets us live a scientific life — after all, the principle of detachment in karma yoga is precisely the method that any good scientist follows. Scientists paralyzed by a fear of having their hypotheses disproven don’t get much done. Similarly, worrying about failing an exam isn’t as conducive to studying as is a detached appreciation of the possibility of failure. Karma yoga turns every action into an experiment from which we obtain useful results, positive or negative, and lets us live and learn. It is simply — but powerfully! — the assertion of the scientific method upon our daily lives.
Such learning requires that we take full responsibility for our actions, and this is where I find a contradiction with pujas. In performing a puja, if one asks for divine help or prays for success in an endeavor, one ascribes a component of the resultant success or failure to divine grace, and thereby fails to take full responsibility for one’s actions. Our poor understanding of the exact mechanism through which divine beings assist their devotees erodes our faith that such help will actually arrive — rare are the souls who truly believe they will receive such help and whom the divine never disappoints. So I find it hard to ask divine beings for assistance when doing so absolves me of some responsibility for the results of my actions.
In particular, I find that the Ganesha puja, with its avowed aim to propitiate Lord Ganesha to remove obstacles from our future, is contradictory to karma yoga. This is the same for any sort of prospective puja, such as the Saraswati Puja, which seeks to create auspicious conditions for action. Such pujas leave room for absolving oneself of some responsibility for one’s actions, which I find is less effective when it comes to learning from what we do. On the other hand, retrospective pujas, where we shower gratitude upon the divine for its hand in our success or failure, allows us to remain humble, which is a critical factor in viewing the world objectively. Such pujas let us take full responsibility but little credit — the optimal mix for a scientific way, karma yogic of life.
Note that a puja is not itself prospective or retrospective, but the way in which it is performed is. I find that the verses in the Ganesha, Saraswati, and Satyanarayana pujas, with their requests for auspicious conditions and hopes for specific outcomes, embody the prospective attitude. But pujas in which we only express our gratitude for the outcomes of our actions to the divine are excellent because they are effective for maintaining humility — for this reason, I enjoy the offering sections of the aforementioned pujas. It is just such things as calling Ganesha as bhaktavanchhitadayakaya (he who grants his devotee’s desires) in his 108 names during the puja which alarm me as contradictory to karma yoga.
I don’t think the prospective attitude is bad, merely that it contradicts the principles of karma yoga which I value. In keeping with this, I do not plan to attend pujas which I perceive as prospective, so that I can try to be as purely retrospective as possible in invoking the divine, on my own. But when there are pujas or bhajan sessions or some other spiritual get-together in which the emphasis is on gratitude and praising the divine, then I see no contradiction and will be happy to attend!
What do you think?