<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Detachment and College Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swadharma.org/2009/11/24/detachment-and-college-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swadharma.org/2009/11/24/detachment-and-college-life/</link>
	<description>The voice of Dharma</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:48:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Saketh</title>
		<link>http://www.swadharma.org/2009/11/24/detachment-and-college-life/comment-page-1/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Saketh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 03:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swadharma.org/?p=2127#comment-769</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
This lack of daily interaction forces us to become more detached from our families; &lt;strong&gt;however, we sometimes trade this attachment for attachment to more material ideas&lt;/strong&gt;.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
This is an extremely thought-provoking point, Brittany. 
Someone I respect once told me to be careful, lest my attempts at detachment degenerate into intense attachment to one material object. I&#039;ve definitely made this mistake.
Someone else I respect once told me that detachment is attachment to something higher. I&#039;ve found that this positive proscription is effective for avoiding the quandary you describe in your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
This lack of daily interaction forces us to become more detached from our families; <strong>however, we sometimes trade this attachment for attachment to more material ideas</strong>.
</p></blockquote>
<p>This is an extremely thought-provoking point, Brittany.<br />
Someone I respect once told me to be careful, lest my attempts at detachment degenerate into intense attachment to one material object. I&#8217;ve definitely made this mistake.<br />
Someone else I respect once told me that detachment is attachment to something higher. I&#8217;ve found that this positive proscription is effective for avoiding the quandary you describe in your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anish</title>
		<link>http://www.swadharma.org/2009/11/24/detachment-and-college-life/comment-page-1/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>Anish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swadharma.org/?p=2127#comment-757</guid>
		<description>I live 45 Minutes away from my college and I have had that problem as well! I think the best way to solve that would be to take a few minutes every day or every other day no matter how busy you are to just talk to at least one family member. In our parents&#039; perspective, they want to know how we&#039;re doing- not necessarily grades-wise, but just how we are in general. I feel that maintaining the habit of calling home every so often would definitely ease their worries about you as well as keep you attached to your family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live 45 Minutes away from my college and I have had that problem as well! I think the best way to solve that would be to take a few minutes every day or every other day no matter how busy you are to just talk to at least one family member. In our parents&#8217; perspective, they want to know how we&#8217;re doing- not necessarily grades-wise, but just how we are in general. I feel that maintaining the habit of calling home every so often would definitely ease their worries about you as well as keep you attached to your family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

