Question of the Week: Why tolerate intolerance?

As Saketh discussed in a previous post, religious intolerance is common, and certainly not unique to Hinduism. Some criticisms of Hinduism include: more than one god is false; worship of idols is false; people with these false beliefs should be converted to the true religion — the list goes on and on. For example, I recently viewed a shocking video that, at certain times, celebrated violence against Hindus, because Hindus believe in many gods and worship idols. Taken aback, I wondered how I should react. As I searched for good points, the opportunity left me, and I questioned myself why I did not have a strong retort on hand. Some of the most common points I have heard from Hindus, in the past are:

  1. Reflection of nature. A defense of the multiple gods of Hinduism as a representation of different forces or aspects of the universe.
  2. Power of idol worship. That idol worship allows a very tangible, and perhaps more personal, connection with the deity, contrasted with more internalized or abstract forms of prayer.
  3. Not polytheistic. An argument that Hinduism is not polytheistic, but actually monotheistic, monist, or perhaps henotheistic, with one supreme Brahman.

These are solid points, yet I notice that, like me, many Hindus, and particularly my peers, choose not to debate. I do not know why. These questions of faith, in my opinion, are open and unresolved, in that there is no right answer or no absolutely correct faith. By remaining quiet, though, Hindus convey the message that the other side is correct. If Hindus respect their own traditions, they cannot remain apathetic on these issues.

We need to go further. None of the above points directly address the intolerance of Hindu beliefs in other belief systems, whether explicit or implicit. But how do you debate against a position that essentially states “I believe this is correct, therefore you are wrong?” I feel that Hindu beliefs are neither superior nor inferior to those of other religions; they are different, and luckily also, compatible with and accepting of other faiths, which is why I feel Hinduism should be defended more powerfully in these situations. Yet it seems that other faiths are not so accepting of Hinduism. Therefore, my question to you is: why do Hindus seem to tolerate intolerance of Hindu beliefs by other religions? How can we better deal with this intolerance in a constructive manner?

Related posts:

  1. Question of the Week: Where do we get our beliefs?
  2. Absorbing other faiths
  3. Explanations
  4. How do we fight the detractors of Hinduism?
  5. Question of the Week: Challenges to Faith at Harvard

2 Comments

  1. Priya wrote:

    In addition to the fact that Hinduism teaches non-combativeness, I think the problem lays in the fact that many Hindus themselves do not know the correct answers. Because Hinduism differs so much across India, and because there are so many scriptures written in a language so unaccessible to most Hindus, we do not learn about Hinduism in the same structured environment that Christians, Jews, or Muslims do. I myself highly value the fact that Hinduism is so flexible and accepting, but I think that it makes Hindus more prone to attacks from other religions since Hindu stances are so ambiguous on so many topics. It’s not possible to change the flexible character of Hinduism, so the only other way Hindus can deal with this issue is to educate themselves as much as they can, and know exactly where the ambiguities lay in Hinduism. 

    Thursday, April 16, 2009 at 6:06pm | Permalink
  2. aneesh wrote:

    Any of your classmates will be tolerant & understanding because they have friends like you who are Hindu, and are able to realize what nice, tolerant people we are :)

    I’ve had misunderstandings about other groups, but hearing people justify themselves had little effect; the misunderstandings were dispelled when I actually got to know people from those groups..

    Friday, April 17, 2009 at 12:40am | Permalink

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.